Legal Opinion

United States v. 10,510 Packaged Computer Towers

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 27, 2001No. C99-4041 CALPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEGGE, District Judge.

This is an in rem seizure and forfeiture case, which is now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. It concerns the disposition of 10,510 packaged computer towers, imported from Taiwan and seized at the Port of Oakland, bearing certification marks registered to United Laboratories. The parties — the U.S. Customs Service (the “government”) and Antee, Inc. (“Antee” or “claimant”)— have stipulated to the essential facts of the case. The case is therefore now one of statutory construction. The statute at issue, 19…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Watkins v. US BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Sakar International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Able Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API