Legal Opinion
Watkins v. US BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 2011No. 09-35996PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1192Opinion by Judge Walter; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH.
OPINION
WALTER, District Judge:
Appellant, Samuel Watkins (“Watkins”), a copyright and trademark attorney, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) in his eight Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, requests for 19 C.F.R. § 133.21(c) Notices of Seizure of Infringing Merchandise (“Notices of Seizure” or “Notices”) from the Ports of San Francisco, Miami,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brown v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Commonwealth v. EisemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Smith Ex Rel. Smith Butz, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.