Douillard v. LMR, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Douillard, appeals from the allowance of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, in which a judge in the Superior Court held that the plaintiff’s evidence of negligent service of alcohol was insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. The plaintiff appealed and we granted his application for direct appellate review. We now *163vacate the summary judgment and remand the matter to the Superior Court for trial.
1. Background. Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and drawing all permissible inferences in his favor, the record on summary judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cimino v. Milford Keg, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Purchase v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Johnson v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Wiska v. St. Stanislaus Social Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Howcroft v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.