Legal Opinion

Schumer v. Schumer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This is an action to annul a marriage pursuant to section 1143 of the Civil Practice Act. A verified answer denying the essential allegations of the complaint was interposed. However, at the time of the trial, the answer was withdrawn and a stipulation, not a part of the record but made with the knowledge of the court, was entered into between the parties. *237No alimony or counsel fee is sought by the plaintiff wife. It is within the atmosphere of this mutually satisfactory arrangement that this litigation was tried.

The only witnesses called were the plaintiff and her mother. The former…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Lomer v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Gildersleeve v. . LandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Winston v. . WinstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roger v. RogerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Primmer v. PrimmerNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API