Legal Opinion
State v. Litvin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 17, 2002No. 2001-045PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Valerie Litvin, was found guilty by a jury of theft by unauthorized taking. See RSA 637:3 (1996). She appeals, arguing that the Trial Court (Perkins, J.) erroneously admitted statements she allegedly made under circumstances that violated her *607constitutional right against compelled self-incrimination. See U.S. CONST, amends. V, XIV; N.H. CONST, pt. I, art. 15. We affirm.
The relevant facts follow. The defendant was a clerk in the City of Berlin’s collection department. In January 1999, her employment was terminated when an investigation revealed that she had signed for and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Mario E. IndoratoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- State v. BrockdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- State v. ChampagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.