Legal Opinion

State v. Aiken

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2007No. S07G0126PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to review the Court of Appeals’s holding that a statement that the appellee, Robert Aiken, a probation officer, gave as part of a criminal investigation into his conduct could not be used at trial against him. More specifically, the case concerns the appropriate test by which to determine whether an incriminating statement made by a government employee during an investigation into his conduct is coerced and inadmissible based on allegations by the employee that he was impliedly threatened with the loss of his job if he did not answer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. United States v. Levette VangatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. HarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Flanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Lengsfeld v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. The State v. Scott.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Georgia Peace Officers Standards & Training Council v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API