Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 1, 2010No. 3—09—0524, 3—09—0525, 3—09—0526 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order to partially quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon the Peoria police department (PPD). We affirm.
FACTS
Defendants Andrew Smith, Gerald Suelter and Jerry Layman (collectively defendants) are officers in the PPD. Smith and Suelter were charged by an indictment with four counts of official misconduct, aggravated battery, mob action, and battery. The indictment alleged that Smith and Suelter shocked Bryce Scott with a Taser and struck him with their feet. Layman was charged by an indictment with four counts of obstructing justice and one count of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jeffrey McKinley v. City of MansfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mario E. IndoratoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SedlacekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Scatchell v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners for Melrose ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- People v. HaleasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. GutierrezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- People v. HaleasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010