Legal Opinion
Pier v. SCHULTZ
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1962No. 30,254PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, C. J.
— This case comes to us on petition to tranfser from the Appellate Court under §4-215, Burns’ 1946 Repl. See: Pier v. Schultz (1961), 177 N. E. 2d 264.
This is an action to recover damages for medical expenses and loss of services resulting from personal injuries sustained by appellant’s son.
Appellees filed a motion to require appellant to make the complaint more specific by stating specifically the facts in support of the conclusions therein stated. The motion was overruled. Appellees then filed a demurrer, challenging the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action. The demurrer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Woodruff v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Lockridge v. Standard Oil Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. HaroldIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Swanson v. ShroatIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fort Wayne National Bank v. DoctorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kopczynski Ex Rel. Palmer v. BargersIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- COLEMAN ET UX. v. DeMossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Barbre v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.