Legal Opinion

COLEMAN ET UX. v. DeMoss

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1969No. 20,244PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This action was initiated by appellee, Marvin L. DeMoss, against appellants, Harry and Vieno M. Coleman, to recover damages for medical expenses and loss of services of his wife due to personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of a fall on property owned by defendant-appellants.

The cause was filed in the Vanderburgh Probate Court and was venued to the Gibson Circuit Court, where it was tried by jury which returned a verdict for Fifteen Thousand dollars.

Defendant-appellants demurred to Paragraphs I and II of plaintiff-appellee’s third amended complaint. The court sustained the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Purcell v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Petroski v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Meadowlark Farms, Inc. v. WarkenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Old Town Development Company v. LangfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API