Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Water Co. v. Harold

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1908No. 21,229PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (12,808); Henry Clay Allen, Judge. Action by Milton S. Harold against tbe Indianapolis Water Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $300, defendant appeals. Transferred from' Appellate Court under cl. 2, §1394 Burns 1908, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

1. Appellee brought this action to recover damages for the wrongful death of his minor son. The allegations of the complaint are, in substance, as follows: That appellant is a corporation organized under the laws of Indiana, and owns and controls a body of water known as “the canal,” extending from the town of *171Broad Ripple into the city of Indianapolis, and used for the purpose of supplying water to said city and its inhabitants; that the canal was from thirty feet to one hundred feet in width and very deep, and prior to the month of March, 1903, appellant had allowed a log or sill to be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dobbins v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. McCall v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Orr Ditch & Water Co. v. Justice Court of Reno TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API