Legal Opinion

Gresty v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1928No. 28,339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for the conversion by the defendant of 136 head of cattle sold by defendant, and 52 head of excess cattle left on the ranch, and the excess feed thereon at the expiration of the lease. The defendant denied the allegations of the petition except as to the execution of the lease, and asked to recover for hay, feed and other items claimed by him, including recovery of one-half of pasture bill paid by defendant for pasture and feed for cattle belonging to both plaintiff and defendant. The court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Leroy & Western Railroad v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Lapham v. Kansas & Texas Oil, Gas & Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Nelson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Security National Bank v. McCutchanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitman v. MashburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Holuba v. FloerschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Kirksey Motors, Inc. v. General Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Kagey v. Fox West Coast Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API