PepsiCo, Inc. v. Sharp
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
This proceeding reviews an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court en banc which affirmed the trial tribunal’s order certifying Clinton Sharp’s (claimant) claim against his employer, Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. (Lee Way), and added Pepsi-Co, Inc. (PepsiCo), as guarantor for payment of benefits following Lee Way’s default. In addition, claimant seeks review of a corrected order denying his request for attorney fees based on the “frivolity” of PepsiCo’s proceeding before the Workers’ Compensation Court en banc. The two proceedings are consolidated for the purpose of written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Lum v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Maryland Casualty Company v. HankinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. BurdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Pepsico, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. BraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Pepsico, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Banks v. Texhoma Temporary Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.