Pepsico, Inc. v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner requests rehearing of this court’s Summary Disposition of April 5, 1990, on the above styled case in that Respondent’s claim was facially defective having been filed outside the time allowed and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. In its Summary Disposition this court stated that PepsiCo v. Sharp, 781 P.2d 814 (Okl.1989), was dispositive of the issue presented in the present case. However, in Sharp, “[t]he statute of limitations *610was satisfied by Sharp’s timely claim against Lee Way,” and therefore, likewise against PepsiCo. Sharp, 781 P.2d at 819. In the present…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990