Pepsico, Inc. v. Allen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner requests rehearing of this court’s Summary Disposition of April 5, 1990, on the above styled case in that Respondent’s claim was facially defective having been filed outside the time allowed and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. In its Summary Disposition this court stated that PepsiCo v. Sharp, 781 P.2d 814 (Okl.1989), was dispositive of the issue presented in the present case. However, in Sharp, “[t]he statute of limitations was satisfied by Sharp’s timely claim against Lee Way,” and therefore, likewise against PepsiCo. Sharp, 781 P.2d at 819. In the present…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Moore v. Tom Morris EnterprisesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metcalf v. KFOR-TV, INC.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990