Legal Opinion

Pepsico, Inc. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1990No. 73455PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner requests rehearing of this court’s Summary Disposition of April 5, 1990, on the above styled case in that Respondent’s claim was facially defective having been filed outside the time allowed and is therefore barred by the statute of limitations. In its Summary Disposition this court stated that PepsiCo v. Sharp, 781 P.2d 814 (Okl.1989), was dispositive of the issue presented in the present case. However, in Sharp, “[t]he statute of limitations was satisfied by Sharp’s timely claim against Lee Way,” and therefore, likewise against PepsiCo. Sharp, 781 P.2d at 819. In the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. PepsiCo, Inc. v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Moore v. Tom Morris EnterprisesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. KFOR-TV, INC.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1992
  2. PepsiCo, Inc. v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API