Legal Opinion

Tillman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1996No. 69628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Kendall Tillman (“Defendant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of stealing, third offense, § 570.040, RSMo 1994,1 and one count of assault, third degree, § 565.070, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of seven years’ imprisonment and one year imprisonment respectively. Defendant filed a Rule 24.035 motion alleging, inter aha: (1) that the trial court was without jurisdiction to accept his guilty pleas because they were entered more than…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Meyer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Woody v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. BranstetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. DELONGMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Coats v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API