Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1993No. 62777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

On January 14, 1992, movant pled guilty to escape from confinement in violation of § 575.210 RSMo 1986. Pursuant to a plea agreement, movant was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, to run consecutively to the sentence he was already serving.

Movant filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion on February 3, 1992, and a verified amended motion and request for evidentiary hearing on May 3, 1992. On August 12, 1992, the motion court issued its findings of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. GalvanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Franks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ellsworth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Jamison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Allmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Woody v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API