Legal Opinion

Aptus Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 30, 2004No. 01-362CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The present action arises from the government’s termination for default of plaintiffs, *640Aptas Company’s, contract to install government-furnished equipment, and design, manufacture, and install contractor-furnished equipment at the government-owned and operated Sault Ste. Marie Hydroelectric Power Plant (the “Soo”) in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.2 The contractor’s right to proceed with work on the contract at issue, DACW35-99C-0001, was terminated for default on June 26, 2000, for failure to make progress,3 unsatisfactory work and unsound…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moreland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. 5860 Chicago Ridge, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Aptus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API