Legal Opinion

State v. Bank of Magdalena

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1928No. 3264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Appellee is the receiver of the insolvent Bank of Magdalena, appointed under the provisions of Laws 1919, c. 120,- § 32. Appellant being a debtor of the bank, made claim to a set-off, which the district court denied.

When the bank suspended payment, appellant was-indebted to it on past-due notes aggregating some $4,800. Socorro county had on deposit in the bank some $10,000. The deposit was secured by a bond given by the United States Fidelity & Indemnity Company. This surety held indemnity in the form of a bond, given by four.of the directors of the bank, of whom…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Richardson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Butler v. Commonwealth Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Gilbertson v. Northern Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Storts v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Melaven v. HunkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Melaven v. SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. O'Connell v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. State v. State Bank of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API