State v. Bank of Magdalena
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
Appellee is the receiver of the insolvent Bank of Magdalena, appointed under the provisions of Laws 1919, c. 120,- § 32. Appellant being a debtor of the bank, made claim to a set-off, which the district court denied.
When the bank suspended payment, appellant was-indebted to it on past-due notes aggregating some $4,800. Socorro county had on deposit in the bank some $10,000. The deposit was secured by a bond given by the United States Fidelity & Indemnity Company. This surety held indemnity in the form of a bond, given by four.of the directors of the bank, of whom…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Richardson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Butler v. Commonwealth Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Gilbertson v. Northern Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Storts v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Melaven v. HunkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Melaven v. SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- O'Connell v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
- State v. State Bank of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934