Legal Opinion

Draughon v. Draughon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1986No. 8612DC228PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not classifying certain money as separate property pursuant to G.S. 50-20(a) and (b). She submits that the court should have found that during the marriage, she acquired separate property in the sum of $8,983.37 from her mother which was used to help pay the mortgage on the family residence held as tenants by the entirety, but that the sum remained separate property. We do not agree.

Under the Equitable Distribution Act, separate property includes all real and personal property acquired by a spouse by bequest, devise, descent, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poore v. PooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Poore v. PooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. McLeod v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Laughter v. LambertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Dixon v. KinserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Tankersley v. TankersleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Lawrence v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Lawrence v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API