Legal Opinion
Quintana v. Knowles
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1992No. 19970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Chief Justice.
Garrett Quintana filed suit to quiet title in a road that provides access to his property. The road traverses property owned and possessed by defendants. The trial court entered a decree in favor of Quintana declaring the road to be a New Mexico public highway established under federal law. Defendants filed notice of appeal, but did not move to stay the trial court’s decree. Relying upon NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-9 (Repl.Pamp.1991) (supersedeas bond requirements in actions involving real or personal property), Quintana filed a motion in the trial court to compel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Pancoast v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cruz v. FTS Construction, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Segal v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Sunland Park v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. Balzer Pacific Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.