Dunbar v. Commercial Electrical Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the Commercial Electrical Supply Company against 5. E. Dunbar. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
December 3, 1908, the plaintiff in error, defendant below, executed to the defendant in error, plain tiff below, his promissory note in the sum of $1,260.58, payable six months after date at St. Louis, Mo. At the same time, there was delivered to the payee of the note, as collateral security for the payment thereof, a certain stock certificate for ten shares of stock in the Dunbar Electrical Supply Company of Oklahoma City, accompanied by a written contract of pledge, included in which was the following undertaking and power of sale:
“And agree to give additional security…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chouteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Robinson v. HurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Betz v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Harn v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Carron v. AbounadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Gault v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Baird v. OlsheskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Williamson-Halsell-Frazier Co. v. State Ex Rel. Tradesmen's State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.