Legal Opinion

McGahren v. Saenger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1995No. 9428SC537PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced this action pro se to recover damages for alleged legal malpractice and fraud. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, N.C.G.S. § l-15(c) (1983). From the entry of summary judgment, plaintiffs appeal.

The facts, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, show that in May 1984 plaintiff Francis McGahren (hereinafter “McGahren”) and C. Walter Weiss formed W & M Investment Company, a partnership, to develop commercial real estate. Defendant was hired to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Hargett v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Thorpe v. DeMentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. S.N.R. Management Corp. v. Danube Partners 141, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Hunter v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Jordan v. CrewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Garrett v. WinfreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API