Legal Opinion

Crockett v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 2010No. 09-599PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.

liThis appeal involves several issues regarding the viability of a lawsuit by appellant Kim Crockett, which raises virtually the same issues as those raised in a previous lawsuit between her business, Omni Holding and Development Corp. (“Omni”), and the appellee, C.A.G. Investments, Inc. (“C.A.G.”). Because we conclude that there is a counterclaim which has not been resolved, we dismiss without prejudice under Rule 54(b).

In 1993, Bob Herren and Tom Papa-christou developed a plan to start a crop-dusting and farm-equipment export business, Omni. Herren was to provide…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. K.C. Properties of N.W. Arkansas, Inc. v. Lowell Investment Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Driggers v. LockeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Haile v. Arkansas Power and Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Bevans v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crockett v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Skalla v. CanepariSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. West Memphis Adolescent Residential, LLC v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Belk v. BelkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Toland v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API