Legal Opinion
Jacob W. Beentjes v. Placer County Air Pollution Control District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 4, 2005No. 03-15598PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
The Placer County Air Pollution Control District (“the District”) is charged under state law with the responsibility of enforcing state and national air quality standards within its region. The District is part of the larger state and federal scheme to meet air quality standards under the federal Clean Air Act.
Jacob W. Beentjes (“Beentjes”) was a former employee of the District as an air pollution control specialist. This case arose when the District terminated Beentjes after he was diagnosed with a serious pulmonary disease and efforts to accommodate his condition were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lee-Thomas v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Pittman v. Oregon, Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William John Liberatore United States of America Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. Sheri Leann IveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Del Campo v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.