Legal Opinion
Del Campo v. Kennedy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2008No. 07-15048PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Our question is whether a private company contracting with a district attorney for services related to a diversion program is entitled to state sovereign immunity. We decide that it is not.
I
American Corrective Counseling Services (“ACCS”), a private corporation, contracted with the District Attorney for Santa Clara County, California, (the “DA”) to run a bad check diversion program. Its conduct of that program generated this litigation.
California criminalizes the making, drawing, uttering, or delivery of any check, draft, or money order “willfully, with intent to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Michael Sato v. Orange Cty. Dept. of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Ismail v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC v. National Trust Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.