Legal Opinion

Jazz Photo Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 2, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-132; Court 04-00494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLIC *

OPINION AND ORDER

STANCE U, Judge.

Before the court is the revised application of Jazz Photo Corporation (“Jazz” or “plaintiff’) for attorneys’ fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2000). In Jazz Photo Corp. v. United States, 31 CIT -, 502 F.Supp.2d 1277 (2007) (“Jazz IV”), the court held that some of the government’s positions in litigation before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Court of Appeals”) in 2005 and 2006 were not substantially justified. The court allowed plaintiff to submit a revised EAJA…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hyatt v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. William J. Kerin, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Love v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  2. Shah Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  3. International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  4. Lizarraga Customs Broker v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border Prot.United States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API