Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 5, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Hickman Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle.

Reversing.

In December, 1911, tbe appellant, International Harvester Company of America, was tried in the Hickman circuit court under an indictment charging it with an offense resulting from,an alleged violation by it of tbe anti-pooling act of 1890, section 198 of tbe constitution and tbe popling act of 1906, as construed and enforced by this court in numerous cases. Appellant did not appear or plead to tbe indictment, but, following tbe return of a verdict from a jury finding it guilty and inflicting a fine of $1,000.00, a default judgment was rendered by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Ex parte KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Ex-parte BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  5. Bronk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dummit v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Legislative Research Commission v. FischerKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Security Savings Bank v. ConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Neal v. Manning, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Engle v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API