Legal Opinion
Rowlette v. Mortimer
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided October 25, 2018No. Case No. 4:18-cv-00143-DCNPublished
1Opinion of the Court
David C. Nye, U.S. District Court Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendants Gerald Mortimer and Linda G. McKinnon Mortimer's (the "Mortimers") Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. 16. Defendant Obstetrics and Gynecology Associates of Idaho Falls, P.A.'s ("OGA") also filed a Motion to Dismiss based upon the same general arguments. Dkt. 17. After holding oral argument, the Court took the motions under advisement. Upon review, the Court now issues the following decision GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART the Motions.
The right to procreate has been recognized by the United States Supreme…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.