Judd v. Comar Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
The plaintiff in error, F. C. Judd, as plaintiff, commenced ■ this action in the district court of Kay county on January 22, 1930, against the defendant in error, Comar Oil Company, defendant in the court below. He sought to recover the sum of $2,900 for alleged damages to his farm by pollution.
On the trial of the cause, the learned trial judge decided that the plaintiff’s asserted right of recovery was barred by a former recovery in another action. In accordance with this decision the jury was directed by the trial judge to return a verdict for the defendant. The ease was brought to this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Freeland v. DolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Fooshee v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bolte v. Aits, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978