Legal Opinion

People v. John Z.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2003No. S103427PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted this case to settle a conflict in Court of Appeal decisions as to whether the crime of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. *758(a)(2)) is committed if the female victim consents to an initial penetration by her male companion, and then withdraws her consent during an act of intercourse, but the male continues against her will. (Compare People v. Vela (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 237 [218 Cal.Rptr. 161](Vela) [no rape committed] with People v. Roundtree (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 846 [91 Cal.Rptr.2d 921] (Roundtree) [rape committed].) We agree with Roundtree and the Court of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. United States v. Ruiz-ApolonioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API