Legal Opinion

Eisenhardt v. Schmidt

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 26, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 N.J. Super. 76 (1953)

98 A.2d 698

GEORGE W. EISENHARDT, PLAINTIFF,

v.

CHARLES P.W. SCHMIDT AND MARGARETTA E. SCHMIDT, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 26, 1953.

Mr. Allen B. Endicott, 3rd, for plaintiff (Messrs. Endicott, Dowling and Endicott, attorneys).

Mr. Robert N. McAllister for defendants (Messrs. Coulomb, McAllister and Hunter, attorneys).

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

The plaintiff herein seeks a judgment against the defendants under N.J.S. 3A:24-44 and seeks to impress a lien on the premises described in the complaint to the extent of the money allegedly due him…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Stevenson v. EarlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Blashfield v. Empire State TelephoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Matthews v. HoaglandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Continental Oil Company v. Pauley Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. People v. Vela PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Bendit v. IntaranteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Bower v. the EstaughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API