Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Malone & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1952No. 235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYaleNtiNe, J.

The defendant contends and strongly urges that the court below should have dismissed plaintiff’s action by judgment as of nonsuit on the ground that he failed to show that the driver of the truck was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the collision. This point is urged here with great earnestness, but the difficulty of defendant’s position on this point lies in the fact that defendant has admitted in its answer that defendant’s driver was its agent and acting within the scope of his duty and authority at the time of the collision. While this admission is not couched in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Call v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Carter v. . Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Gibbs v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Freeman v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Widows Fund of Sudan Temple v. UmphlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. White v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API