Legal Opinion

Moore v. Palmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by D. W. Moore against James Palmer and others, beard by Judge T. A. McNeill and a jury, at September Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Guileord County. From a judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the defendants, James Palmer and John Eudy, the testator of the other defendant, were partners and that at the death of Eudy the partnership owed to the plaintiffs a balance of about $235 for goods sold and delivered to them. On the trial the defendant Palmer was allowed to testify over the objection of the other defendant, “that be and the *970testator Eudy bad entered into a co-partnership for the purpose of cleaning out and putting in proper shape and condition, and selling the Lindsay mine. That they were to bear all expenses incident thereto…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charlotte Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. RippySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Morrow v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Luttrell v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Medlin v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Bedsole v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API