Legal Opinion

Luttrell v. . Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court submitted the following issues:

1. Were the goods purchased for the purpose of being used in (597) the construction of a railroad; and, if so, did plaintiffs know of such purpose at time of purchase?

2. Were said goods ever delivered to the Piedmont Lumber, Ranch and Mining Company?

3. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs, as alleged in the complaint?(601) The jury found in response to the first issue, "No," and in response to the second issue, "Yes," and did not answer the third issue. The verdict was, by consent, received by the clerk after the adjournment recess of court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . PlummerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Grubbs v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Henderson v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Smiley v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Guilford v. . Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Lee v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Tillett v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Lee v. HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API