Legal Opinion
Herbert F. Teichman v. Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1997No. 95-2168PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture. Plaintiff brought this action to obtain judicial review of the Secretary’s decision to deny his claim for relief under the Federal Tree Assistance Program of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Pub.L. No. 101-624, § 2255, 104 Stat. 3359, 3974 (1990), for the apple trees he lost due to fire blight. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the order of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are undisputed. Plaintiff Herbert F.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Glynn Douglas, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Argo-Tech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Gallagher v. Croghan Colonial BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pencheng Si v. Laogai Research Foundation FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Estate of Muer v. KarbelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Charles A. MuerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Petzoldt v. GlickmanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997