Ward v. Grant
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was délivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile casualty. The jury answered special questions and returned a general verdict for plaintiff. No judgment was rendered on the verdict. Each of the defendants filed three motions: (1) To set aside the answers to each (except one) of the special questions, on the ground that they were not supported by evidence; (2) for judgment on the answers to the special questions, and on the entire evidence, notwithstanding the- general verdict; and (3) for a new trial. These…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- J. B. Colt Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Stroup v. Northeast Oklahoma RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Maddy v. HockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lord v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Posey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Walker v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Underhill v. MotesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.