Legal Opinion

Ward v. Grant

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1933No. 31,143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was délivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile casualty. The jury answered special questions and returned a general verdict for plaintiff. No judgment was rendered on the verdict. Each of the defendants filed three motions: (1) To set aside the answers to each (except one) of the special questions, on the ground that they were not supported by evidence; (2) for judgment on the answers to the special questions, and on the entire evidence, notwithstanding the- general verdict; and (3) for a new trial. These…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. B. Colt Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Stroup v. Northeast Oklahoma RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Maddy v. HockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lord v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Posey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Walker v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Underhill v. MotesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API