Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cardillo

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 13, 1942No. 8011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.

This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.1 Appellant, a self-insurer, filed its bill in the District Court to enjoin the enforcement of the deputy com-missioner’s award in favor of appellee Braswell. Judge Bailey dismissed the bill, on the ground that there was substantial evidence of injury to support the findings of the deputy.

On this appeal, it is insisted (1) that appellant has paid appellee compensation for a period of five years under the “temporary partial disability” section of the Act (Section 8(e) .and is. not required to make any further payments; and (2) that there is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS'INS. CO. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeFries v. ASSOCIATION OF OWNERS, 999 WILDERHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  2. J. v. Vozzolo, Inc., Successor to James Vincent Vozzolo v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'rCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Furlong v. O'HearneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  5. DeFries v. ASSOCIATION OF OWNERS, 999 WILDERHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API