Legal Opinion
Furlong v. O'Hearne
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 17, 1956No. 3828PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Claimant’s appeal from an order denying his claim presents the question whether he sustained an accidental injury within the meaning of 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 902(2), 903.
Much of the following statement is taken directly from the Deputy Commissioner’s findings; the other facts are stated as favorably to the Deputy Commissioner’s conclusion as is justified by the record considered as a whole.
In January, 1955, and for several years prior thereto, claimant, 42, was employed as a rigger by Maryland Shipbuilding and Drydock Company. He has a congenital condition in his low back,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. CrumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Volpe v. Northeast Marine TerminalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- American National Red Cross v. HagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Miller v. O'HearneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Joseph Volpe v. Northeast Marine TerminalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.