Legal Opinion

Kansas Rolling Mill Co. v. Bovard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the ruling (made September 2, 1884), which the defendant company brings here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Wyandotte county by James A. Bovard and Frank P. Dickson against the Kansas Eolling Mill Company, to recover on alleged acceptances by the defendant of three checks or drafts. The defendant is a corporation created under the laws of Kansas, whose place of business is or was at Eosedale, in Wyandotte county. The sheriff of the county served the summons upon Ira Harris, who was believed to be the vice president and managing agent of the rolling mill company, and the sheriff could not find…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potter v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Hockett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. PolleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Eastern Kansas Oil Co. v. BeutnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Reynolds v. Packers' National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. City of Mangum v. HeatlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. State Ex Rel. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API