Legal Opinion

Hockett v. Turner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Cowley District Court. Questions of practice only are decided in this case, and all necessary facts and proceedings are fully stated in the opinion. The order complained^ of was made at the May Term 1877 of the district court, and Hochett, plaintiff, brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

Plaintiff in error challenges the correctness of an order of the district court taxing, upon a continuance, the costs of the term against him. The facts briefly are these: The case stood for trial upon petition, answer, and reply. A jury was impanneled, plaintiff introduced testimony in support of his petition, and then, before resting in chief, offered testimony to prove the new matters alleged in his reply. To this the defendant objected, and the court sustained the objection. Plaintiff then asked leave to amend his petition by adding to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Bliss v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Kansas Rolling Mill Co. v. BovardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Paul v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API