Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Although the plaintiff’s petition was brought in two separate counts, both counts were based on the contention that the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from the failure of the railroad to provide couplers in accordance with the Safety Appliance Act (45 U. S. C. A. § 2): “It shall be unlawful for any common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hohenleitner v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1910
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atlanta Joint Terminals v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Bracy v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
- Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Lumber Terminals, Inc. v. NowakowskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.