Legal Opinion
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Ray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1917No. 8363PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by L. J. Ray, administratrix of the estate of H. E. Ray, deceased, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and de* fendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On February 5, 1915, defendant in error, L. J. Ray, as administratrix of the estate of H. E. Ray, deceased, sued plaintiff in error, Chicago, Rock Island á Pacific Railway Company, in' the district court of. Stephens county in damages for the negligent killing of her said son, H. E. Ray. As grounds for recovery, the petition alleged:
“That on said 8th day of July, 1914, the said H. E. Ray was acting as.brakeman for the defendant on one of its trains at Kingfisher ; that said train .at said time was engaged in switching operation, and.was.backing, under the direction of its conductor, who was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Florence Metcalfe, Administratrix of the Estate of John E. Metcalfe, Deceased v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GuthridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919