Parker v. Wadleigh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Mayes County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action between D. C. Parker and G. A. Wadleigh, administrator. From the judgment, Parker brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.
A motion for new trial being overruled on October 9, 1913, the defendant being granted 90 days in which to make and serve case, an order made in April, -1913, purporting to extend the time previously granted, which had expired, is null and void. See Turley v. Hayes et al., 28 Okla. 655, 115 Pac. 769; Devault et al. v. Merchants’ Exch. Co., 22 Okla. 624, 98 Pac. 342; Carr v. Thompson et al., 27 Okla. 7, 110 Pac. 667.
Counsel for plaintiff in error contends that, should the case-made be of no force, the appeal will stand for errors that may be reviewed by transcript. It is true that the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Devault v. Merchants' Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Carr v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Saxon v. HardinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Turley v. Hayes & ShirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harrison v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- In Re Assessment of Central Nat. Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Spears v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914