Legal Opinion

Turley v. Hayes & Shirk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1911No. 2203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Courtj Sam■ Hooker, Judge. Action between G. W. Turley and Hayes & Shirk. Prom the judgment, Turley brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This is a proceeding by petition in error and ease-made, and there is a motion to dismiss upon the ground that the case-made was not served within the time fixed by order of the court. The motion for a new trial was overruled on September 12, 1910, at which time plaintiff in error was allowed 60 days in which to malee and serve his case for appeal to this court. The case-made was served upon counsel for defendants in error on the 12th day of November, 1910, or 61 days after the granting by the court of the order extending the time for that purpose.

The case-made, not having been served within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Devault v. Merchants' Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Carr v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Parker v. WadleighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Hurst v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Bottoms v. NeukirchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API