Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1921No. 11395PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole Coynty; J. W. Bolen, Judge. Action by Willie Harrison, a citizen of the Seminole Nation, agaist Frank H. Reed and others, to recover certain lands allotted to him as such citizen of the Semmole Nation. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This cause is presented on the motion of deienuant in error Frank H. Reed to dismiss this appeal for failure to mane and serve case-maue within the s.attt-tory period of time, or within any extension of uiue allowed uy tiie court.

On the 4th day of November, 1919, judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in error Frank H. Reed, and against plaintiff, Willie Harrison, who is plaintiff in error in this court. For convenience we will refer to Willie Harrison as plaintiff, the same as he appeared in the court below, and our reference to defendant will mean Frank H. Reed, who was one of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Folsom v. BillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Yick Sung v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Petty v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Sugg v. Farm Home Savings Loan Ass'n.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Jones v. BlantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Shinn v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. In Re Guardianship of BaptisteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API