Legal Opinion

Heldt v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1976No. 513 (1974)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The plaintiff, Walter R. Heldt, an employee of the Weyerhaeuser Company, was injured at work while cleaning out a debarking machine that had been manufactured by the defendant, Nicholson Manufacturing Company. Heldt’s complaint was dismissed following the jury’s determination that his negligence exceeded that of any of the defendants. We affirm.

The Nicholson debarker is a machine designed to remove the bark from logs. Logs are brought into the debarker by a conveyor belt; and as they approach the debarking mechanism, a hydraulically operated roller is activated by an electric eye. This roller…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Luque v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cappon v. O'DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Peeples v. SargentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API