Legal Opinion

Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1982No. 2177PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The difficult issue in this appeal is whether, in an action by an employee against a third party tortfeasor, the employer can be joined as an additional defendant for the purpose of apportioning negligence under the Comparative Negligence Act. The trial court held that joinder was barred by Section 303 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, 1 and dismissed the attempted joinder. We agree and affirm.

Fred Heckendorn, an employee of the Carnation Company, was injured when he was struck by a falling bulkhead while unloading a railroad box car. The car was owned by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Collegeville Borough v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Kelly v. Carborundum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Reliance Insurance v. Richmond MacHine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Hall v. Goodman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API