State v. Muhm
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Thomas Muhm was convicted of all five counts in an indictment alleging: one count of attempted first degree rape, one count of first degree rape, two counts of sexual contact with a child under sixteen, and one count of criminal pedophilia. The charges arose from allegations of weekly sexual abuse of two boys over several years. Muhm appeals arguing that: (1) the counts were multiplicitous and duplicitous in violation of due process and double jeopardy concerns; (2) the State failed to give notice of a report and the opinions of an expert witness; and, (3) the circuit…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Larry Starks, in No. 74-1966 Appeal of Alonzo Robinson, in No. 74-1947. Appeal of Donald Everett Abney, in No. 74-1967Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Michael E. Valentine v. Khelleh Konteh, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Tweed v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.