Legal Opinion

In re the Liquidation of New York Title & Mortgage Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The uncertificated portion of the mortgage investments claimed by the title company is subordinate to the portion represented by outstanding certificates. (See Matter of *38New York Title & Mortgage Co. [Series FW-1], 155 Misc. 651; 157 id. 271; affd., 248 App. Div. 715; affd., 272 N. Y. 556; Matter of Lawyers Mortgage Co. [545 West End Ave.], 157 Misc. 813; affd., 248 App. Div. 715; affd., 272 N. Y. 554; Matter of New York Title & Mortgage Co. [Series N-9] Additional Special Term, 163 Misc. 196.) The certificates held by the title company are, however, entitled to share equally with those held…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Mittlemann v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. In re Lawyers Mortgage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Matter of Lawyers Mortgage CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Mittlemann v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re 24-52 44th Street, Long Island CityNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In re the Liquidation of New York Title & Mortgage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In re Lawyers Westchester Mortgage & Title Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API