Legal Opinion
Mittlemann v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are trustees appointed October 25, 1935, under a trust indenture for the “ Reorganization of Series Q Mortgage Investments; ” that this trust indenture was promulgated and put into effect under the provisions of the Schackno Act (Laws of 1933, chap. 745) with the approval of two-thirds of the series Q certificate holders; that certificates of part interest in series Q of New York Title and Mortgage Company in the face value of upwards of $10,200,000, have been issued from time to time, commencing in 1923, to upwards of 3,200 certificate holders and…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Elkind v. Chase National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Anglo California National Bank v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Rudikoff v. BYRNENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Weil v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.